How We Check Answers

Research Methodology

TinyThat articles begin with real questions and are built through a simple process: understand the intent, check reliable sources, explain clearly, and make the answer easier to remember.

01

Start with a real question

We begin with the wording people actually use, not a polished headline invented after the fact.

02

Understand the reader's intent

We ask what the reader really wants to know: the cause, the history, the mechanism, the myth, or the practical takeaway.

03

Check reliable sources

We look for institutional, educational, scientific, historical, and primary sources when they are available.

04

Compare explanations

If multiple explanations exist, we compare them instead of choosing the neatest answer too quickly.

05

Write the quick answer

The page should give readers a direct answer before asking them to read more.

06

Add context and visuals

Examples, diagrams, timelines, and comparisons are used when they make the answer easier to remember.

07

Review for clarity

We remove unnecessary jargon, soften claims that are too strong, and make the explanation skimmable.

Reliable source types

  • Official institutions and government pages.
  • Museums, archives, and primary documents when available.
  • Scientific organizations, universities, textbooks, and reference works.
  • Peer-reviewed research when the topic calls for it.
  • Reputable news, educational publishers, and books for context.

What research is for

The goal is not to overwhelm the reader with every possible detail. The goal is to give enough reliable context that the answer becomes understandable.

TinyThat is designed for ordinary readers. We translate research into a clear explanation without pretending uncertainty has disappeared.

Limits of our research

Some questions do not have a single perfect answer. In those cases, TinyThat explains the strongest available explanation and says when something is uncertain.

TinyThat is not a substitute for professional advice, academic research, or primary-source investigation when a decision has serious consequences.